User info

Welcome, Guest! Please login or register.

You are here » And all the » Theory and debate, discussion literature » The actual question

The actual question

Page: 1 2  
Post reply

Posts 1 to 30 of 40

1
  • Posted by: Stedman
  • Трижды гад
  • Stedman
  • Posts: 608
  • Respect: +7
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    99,7,6,6,6
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: 8/82

Once me blowing the one writer for the stockade letters in dialogue after mark punctuation characters.
Was roughly so:
— Vasya, pprivet! — Ohblezlyy a looked him wedded to eyes in his eyes and zavilyal tail.

And need to:
– A that Kazbich? – withasked I impatiently have shtabs-captain.
(Lermontov)
Or
– Nu, full of the, full of the! – with, she show Pechorin, filled his was. – Is I not the same?
(Lermontov)

As we see — everywhere small hew after mark punctuation characters.

So, when Direct speech or replica faces words author, then write on so:

– you need dead souls? – asked Sobakevich simply, without intention of astonishment …

Here is how something so.
I this have learned to memorise and deleted its the stockade after point, replacing an his on comma and beginning write with small hew.
But had I in have seemed frozen. Open today books Diana Udovichenko, so there this the stockade on chastokole and picket fence haunts.
1. — This is you pro that? — Isharply developed a and are you staring at on Vergildu.
2. — A as same magic Listvy? — Byrasotka tricky prischurila eyes.
And camping on D.
This Raasclaat, man.

And immediately same in this book after similar signs, reviewed by higher, are found smallhew.
Where the truth, Messrs.?

0

2
  • Posted by: 50 BMG
  • Пулерастратчик
  • 50 BMG
  • Posts: 482
  • Respect: +9
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Придумщик
  • Грудь в крестах:
    99
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: 1/18

I was accustomed write avtorskii the text with small hew, as and all writers, which I read.

0

3
  • Posted by: dedMcAr
  • Домовой
  • dedMcAr
  • Posts: 2409
  • Respect: +79
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    1
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: -\4
  • Рассказов опубликовано: 1

Truly increasingly.
Can explain, as I understand.

— Hey, Angelin! — members got I a waitress. Beauty turned. I scared to stiffen: — Sorry, this I not you!

In this case goes comment, the logical continuation of proposals.

— Hey, Angelin! — Pretty Woman turned and I scared to stiffen: — Sorry, this I not you!

Here goes coupling two semantic proposals.

0

4
  • Posted by: Stedman
  • Трижды гад
  • Stedman
  • Posts: 608
  • Respect: +7
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    99,7,6,6,6
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: 8/82

But there is same certain rules, alone for all and suddenly such a bullshit. And over reading after all worked a host pantheon’s greatest connoisseurs — artistic editor of, and AGVC 3, responsible editor of.
As same sounds the rule, which they be driven?

0

5
  • Posted by: Stedman
  • Трижды гад
  • Stedman
  • Posts: 608
  • Respect: +7
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    99,7,6,6,6
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: 8/82
Старенький кряхтельник wrote:

's $increasingly.
Can explain, as I understand.

— Hey, Angelin! — members got I a waitress. Beauty turned. I scared to stiffen: — Sorry, this I not you!

In this case goes comment, the logical continuation of proposals.

— Hey, Angelin! — Pretty Woman turned and I scared to stiffen: — Sorry, this I not you!

Here goes coupling two semantic proposals.

Grandfather, you me better tell, as this rule is called ;), to I have learned to memorise and could argue fact, and the I in displeased.

0

6
  • Posted by: Stedman
  • Трижды гад
  • Stedman
  • Posts: 608
  • Respect: +7
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    99,7,6,6,6
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: 8/82

And there, in nige, there yours dorks, there precisely so and there is — replica individual and the stockade author. And increasingly, further is faring consider part of or the next replica already another individual.

0

7
  • Posted by: egituman
  • координатор Периметра
  • egituman
  • Posts: 2077
  • Respect: +57
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Придумщик
  • Грудь в крестах:
    1
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: 2/111

I not know pro rule. Write with small. Intuitively seems, that correctly wrote Grandpa. But as should be — not know.

0

8
  • Posted by: dedMcAr
  • Домовой
  • dedMcAr
  • Posts: 2409
  • Respect: +79
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    1
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: -\4
  • Рассказов опубликовано: 1

Regional, again same, I.M.H.O.,.
Your example with tacky the cat the right, but partly.
Lesse buck.

— Vasya, pprivet! — mangy a looked him wedded to eyes in his eyes and zavilyal tail.

Easily, without losses semantic and intonatsionnoy burden alongside

— Vasya, pprivet!
Mangy a looked him wedded to eyes in his eyes and zavilyal tail.


And now adding:

— Vasya, pprivet! — routinely wait Ivanovich. Mangy a looked him wedded to eyes in his eyes and zavilyal tail.


Here is here

— routinely wait

already only with small.

0

9
  • Posted by: Stedman
  • Трижды гад
  • Stedman
  • Posts: 608
  • Respect: +7
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    99,7,6,6,6
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: 8/82

There are several schemes in textbooks:
1.1. Words author are preceded by cue or direct speech

And:
– R.
And:
– the R!
And:
– the R?

2. Direct speech or replica faces words author

– the R, – and.
– the R! – and.
– the R? – and.
Everywhere with small!

3. Direct speech or replica caught words author

– the R, – and, – the
– the R, – and. – R.

4. Words author caught sentiment of
And:
– the R, – and.
And:
– the R! – and.
And:
– the R? – and.

And upright big hew?

Last edited by Stedman (Feb 28 2013 19:08:55)

0

10
  • Posted by: dedMcAr
  • Домовой
  • dedMcAr
  • Posts: 2409
  • Respect: +79
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    1
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: -\4
  • Рассказов опубликовано: 1

Why I said — partly the right!

Regional, in all times in your case to be sure more correctly was would option:

— Vasya, pprivet!
Mangy a looked him wedded to eyes in his eyes and zavilyal tail.

0

11
  • Posted by: Stedman
  • Трижды гад
  • Stedman
  • Posts: 608
  • Respect: +7
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    99,7,6,6,6
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: 8/82
Старенький кряхтельник wrote:

regional, again same, I.M.H.O.,.
Your example with tacky the cat the right, but partly.
Lesse buck.

Easily, without losses semantic and intonatsionnoy burden alongside

And now adding:

Here is here

Already only with small.


Grandfather, increasingly correctly, except first proposals, if be guided by those rules, that I know.

0

12
  • Posted by: dedMcAr
  • Домовой
  • dedMcAr
  • Posts: 2409
  • Respect: +79
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    1
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: -\4
  • Рассказов опубликовано: 1

And now try to imagine, as need was would argue fact similar pillar. Quite simply. If would this resisted with continuation of.

— Vasya, pprivet! — mangy a looked him wedded to eyes in his eyes and zavilyal tail. And Ivanovich continued: — Asshole you, mangy!


Here is Aha,, I.M.H.O.,. Such a construction preferable to, than break

— Vasya, pprivet!
Mangy a looked him wedded to eyes in his eyes and zavilyal tail.
And Ivanovich continued:
— Asshole you, mangy!

0

13
  • Posted by: Stedman
  • Трижды гад
  • Stedman
  • Posts: 608
  • Respect: +7
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    99,7,6,6,6
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: 8/82

Grandfather, I with you agree on three hundred percent, that such a construction preferable to, but we a bit departed from themes.
There is construction the right, there is contributed mightily. There is certain rules of spelling, which should abide by. And what can be any avrgument prove — not question. I, for example, I can prove the famous, why pink elephants not fly and argue fact its.
We search for truth. And where she? There, where are respected rules of spelling. And where they are respected? If work on proposed Balkan formulas in textbooks.

0

14
  • Posted by: dedMcAr
  • Домовой
  • dedMcAr
  • Posts: 2409
  • Respect: +79
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    1
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: -\4
  • Рассказов опубликовано: 1

Are respected?! Geu! You guys, guess what-shkolyary somewhere here wrote, that this new schooling requirement. At all khrenachit increasinglywith big hew.
I himself was in braced.

0

15
  • Posted by: Stedman
  • Трижды гад
  • Stedman
  • Posts: 608
  • Respect: +7
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    99,7,6,6,6
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: 8/82

I in of shock, in general.
As a conservative, d write with their accompanied, they me more expensive ;).

0

16
  • Posted by: dedMcAr
  • Домовой
  • dedMcAr
  • Posts: 2409
  • Respect: +79
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    1
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: -\4
  • Рассказов опубликовано: 1

Decided to conduct still a bit enquiry curtailed on topic.
Ah, in times.

In now officially sitting vault rules Russian of spelling are “EU Russian spell checker and punctuation ”, adopted in 1956!year.


Errori, but for this time passed more than half a century, if very polished. Reality I to what for a half-century until these rules was in rules "five" and quietly would accord in letter "krasnyya gates." ;)

In two.
This increasingly-??? more common, shkolyarno-student rules — ah, if noticed, then the proposed in allowances schemes quite uproschenny, in books meet far more sophisticated design, oga?

Vot. Dug up examples from remittances.. Not need to frown. Publication Eksmo. A series of transfer very and very qualitatively. One senses the good incapable forward Edited and meticulous proofreading editions.

– Javadxan … How see, the new separate street movement secured desirable results. – He noddedon huge pile of backed securities on the table. – I received together complaining from, seven Auriga (slave) and Drover's. Many run work. Outsource my lasting gratitude the sergeant Column. And his team.

– totes, all I! – noddedDuncan and shmygnul nose. – Then why oh why I, of course, was younger than. – Heshort-sightedly prischurilsya on Shnobbi Shnobbsa. – Shnobbi, and why on you women?


And here is again — a clear the division upper and lowercase precisely for that of meaning Walnut, I.M.H.O., which I accelerated higher.

Last edited by dedMcAr (Mar 1 2013 10:00:37)

0

17
  • Posted by: Shurki
  • Беспризорник
  • Shurki
  • Posts: 822
  • Respect: +37
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Придумщик
  • Грудь в крестах:
    6,6
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: 2/6
  • Рассказов опубликовано: 2

And I offered to publish references to "bosses." :writing:

--

And this only on top but instead to.

Last edited by Shurki (Mar 1 2013 12:48:06)

0

18
  • Posted by: dedMcAr
  • Домовой
  • dedMcAr
  • Posts: 2409
  • Respect: +79
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    1
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: -\4
  • Рассказов опубликовано: 1

Again twenty-five. Yes memorized I and the letter. Ru. And Rosenthal syndrome handling of a.
And know, that there written. But! Here is examples such actual structures there there is no — simply there is no. Shurki, esteem more thoroughly, what precisely kandibobery I'll be in a minute'll disassemble.

0

19
  • Posted by: dedMcAr
  • Домовой
  • dedMcAr
  • Posts: 2409
  • Respect: +79
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    1
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: -\4
  • Рассказов опубликовано: 1

Ah here is, shurki. Another example.
Neofit of Bulgaria Ornelliya, tutochke

– I is content to live, – he took out box.
– No, wait! – was it the blonde guy charge to him. – You not can simply so take and … and …


In-about-from.

Now I.M.H.O.,.

– I is content to live! – and he took out box.
– Wait! – Belobrysyy charge to him. – You not can simply so take and … and …

Although the first — as times by the rules. The second — dedovskaya vkusovschina. Umovamі lepshe? Eslecho, I pro propisnuyu izhitsu.

Last edited by dedMcAr (Mar 20 2013 19:43:50)

0

20
  • Posted by: Shurki
  • Беспризорник
  • Shurki
  • Posts: 822
  • Respect: +37
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Придумщик
  • Грудь в крестах:
    6,6
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: 2/6
  • Рассказов опубликовано: 2
Старенький кряхтельник wrote:

Nu here is, shurki. Another example.
Neofit of Bulgaria Ornelliya, tutochke

In-about-from.

Now I.M.H.O.,.

– I is content to live! – and he took out box.
– Wait! – was it the blonde guy charge to him. – You not can simply so take and … and …

Although the first — as times by the rules. The second — dedovskaya vkusovschina. Umovamі lepshe? Eslecho, I pro propisnuyu izhitsu.

Edited Старенький кряхтельник (Today 19 :43: 50)

I would tilted towards to -boarding, for this same his "modifier" (literature name of). He type not simply cel with bright the eyebrows, namely have operated face, formally appropriate author.

Remember on leetspeak, speculated — as write name mutants and of normalcy. I and now inclination is, that with capitalized.

Last edited by Shurki (Mar 20 2013 20:14:34)

0

21
  • Posted by: dedMcAr
  • Домовой
  • dedMcAr
  • Posts: 2409
  • Respect: +79
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    1
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: -\4
  • Рассказов опубликовано: 1

Shurki, alongside.

– I is content to live! – and he took out box.
– Wait! – naparnegcharge to him. – You not can simply so take and … and …

– I is content to live! – and he took out box.
– Wait! – Naparnegcharge to him. – You not can simply so take and … and …


A fucking criminal! Now kudoy?

In my opinion, and eschebvottak:

– I is content to live! – and he took out box.
– Wait! – Naparnegcharge to him: – You not can simply so take and … and …

Last edited by dedMcAr (Mar 20 2013 20:19:54)

0

22
  • Posted by: Renson
  • Гигантик мысли
  • Renson
  • Posts: 995
  • Respect: +17
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    6
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: 8/27
  • Рассказов опубликовано: 2
Старенький кряхтельник wrote:

– No, wait! – was it the blonde guy charge to him .– You not can simply so take and … and …

Dot.
Point.
Point.
Never give in this place point. Nor-developed-yes.

0

23
  • Posted by: Shurki
  • Беспризорник
  • Shurki
  • Posts: 822
  • Respect: +37
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Придумщик
  • Грудь в крестах:
    6,6
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: 2/6
  • Рассказов опубликовано: 2
Старенький кряхтельник wrote:

– I is content to live! – and he took out box.
– Wait! – naparneg charge to him. – You not can simply so take and … and …


Partner — this stilisticheskaya form of interaction heroes confirming stories with. This not name of. Therefore with "small".
And here is where have you have created. andhe?
This already is read on Different, as a consequence any something even ordinary. Flushed st st, prerequisites (not can find the money caregiver words)
Example:
— We open the corned beef, — and he took out box.

In original version written indeed do. Expresses emotions, resolve. In my opinion

Last edited by Shurki (Mar 20 2013 21:26:31)

0

24
  • Posted by: dedMcAr
  • Домовой
  • dedMcAr
  • Posts: 2409
  • Respect: +79
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    1
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: -\4
  • Рассказов опубликовано: 1

Javadxan. A fucking criminal! Now'm able to think clearly koychavo. F-fuck., what thin the brink of, so and porezatsa iiaeia. I such a hell is that always essentially intuitive lyapil, cho.
And here is so imkhuyu, that "and" quite not surplus. That bank to open, that veins — one get suzhetnyy predposyl to good.

Last edited by dedMcAr (Mar 21 2013 01:15:29)

0

25
  • Posted by: Отшельник
  • Беспризорник
  • Posts: 71
  • Respect: +0
  • Допуск критика: Форумный критик

Source code:
– I is content to live, – he took out box.
– No, wait! – was it the blonde guy charge to him. – You not can simply so take and … and …

Grandfather:
– I is content to live! – and he took out box.
– Wait! – Naparneg charge to him: – You not can simply so take and … and …

Grandfather, you replaced the emotional charged. If in the first case "he" — embattled,, frustrated by, says and simultaneouslyreaches box, then in your altered "he" — lawsuit brought really paranoid, which first yelling, and then for box grabs. (Utrirovano)
Namber the contestant: If naparneg — nickname, then:! — Naparneg. And if naparneg — naparneg, then:! — naparneg, so as in this case! Will replace comma, albeit applies to the early proposals, to "Wait!".

0

26
  • Posted by: dedMcAr
  • Домовой
  • dedMcAr
  • Posts: 2409
  • Respect: +79
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    1
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: -\4
  • Рассказов опубликовано: 1

Than good this forum — twelve years kid something, yes and would teach grandfather.

Continue continue to.


– I is content to live! – he took out box.
– Wait! – embattled,, frustrated by bolster the the stooge weary, disappointedly and a whimper looked on the speaker, and naparneg with in the glow of continued: – You not can simply so take and … and …

Last edited by dedMcAr (Mar 21 2013 11:04:37)

0

27
  • Posted by: Shurki
  • Беспризорник
  • Shurki
  • Posts: 822
  • Respect: +37
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Придумщик
  • Грудь в крестах:
    6,6
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: 2/6
  • Рассказов опубликовано: 2

Even a few interesting ssyley.
Can for whom and new.




Ah and himself you can watch else.

0

28
  • Posted by: dedMcAr
  • Домовой
  • dedMcAr
  • Posts: 2409
  • Respect: +79
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    1
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: -\4
  • Рассказов опубликовано: 1

Thank you, bro.
Modicum mostly and obvious things, but re never prevents. And someone, a squanderer be, and first time will give a talk.

0

29
  • Posted by: Shurki
  • Беспризорник
  • Shurki
  • Posts: 822
  • Respect: +37
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Придумщик
  • Грудь в крестах:
    6,6
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: 2/6
  • Рассказов опубликовано: 2
Старенький кряхтельник wrote:

. Modicum mostly and obvious things.

Me always interestingly to read such "be utterly evidence, Margaret", or not evidence, Margaret, and rules, councils and camping on P.
Helps understand-test himself in their judgments, their any something beliefs.

0

30
  • Posted by: dedMcAr
  • Домовой
  • dedMcAr
  • Posts: 2409
  • Respect: +79
  • Допуск критика: Рецензент
  • Допуск автора: Сочинитель
  • Грудь в крестах:
    1
  • Рассказов/Рецензий: -\4
  • Рассказов опубликовано: 1

Displaced in more appropriate subject.

Grandfather.

0

Post reply
Page: 1 2  

You are here » And all the » Theory and debate, discussion literature » The actual question